Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 25, 2013 18:04:24 GMT 1
Four motions have been submitted so far (but Im guessing we have enough time for some last minute proposals if neccesary)
Motion 1: The congress upholds motion 7 from the previous congress, which reads: "The congress demands that the MRPT should under no circumstances allow a government supported by the MRPT to take steps leading to the end of the Monarchy."
Motion 2: The congress upholds motion 8 from the previous congress, which reads: "The congress demands that the MRPT should under no circumstances allow a government supported by the MPRT to take steps that are in conflict with, or lead to the end of, the separation between church and state in talossa."
Motion 3: Since there are no candidates for the Florencian Senate Election yet, the congress believes another party wide vote to determine our endorsement should be held during the week before the elections.
Motion 4: The congress recognises that the first preference of the party regarding the formation of a government, if possible, should be to form a coalition with the ZRT, NPW and CSPP.
Voting starts now and will end on the 30th.
|
|
Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 27, 2013 3:27:51 GMT 1
Since there is still enought time to vote on them, I have submitted some last minute motions. (I've asked the congres leader if he was ok with it) Motion 5: The congress adopts the following as the MRPT 50 word statement for the next elections: "The Moderate Radical Party of Talossa is the party that doesn’t want changes for the sake of change, but for the sake of its citizens when it is needed to lead to a better, happier tomorrow. We are united for a free, active, and diverse Talossa. Please vote MRPT today."
Motion 6: Since one of the candidates for the Maricopan Senate race has suddenly dropped out, the congress declares the result of the current vote on the MRPT senate endorsement for Maricopa invalid and proposes another partywide vote be held during the week before the elections, unless another candidate than Sir Iusti Canun gets the endorsement.
Motion 7: Since one of the candidates for the Fiovan Senate race has suddenly dropped out, the congress declares the result of the current vote on the MRPT senate endorsement for Fiova invalid and proposes another partywide vote be held during the week before the elections, unless another candidate than Ian Txaglh gets the endorsement.
|
|
Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 27, 2013 3:28:15 GMT 1
1. PER 2. PER 3. PER 4. PER 5. PER 6. PER 7. PER
|
|
Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 27, 2013 13:34:24 GMT 1
Since no-one else has voted yet, I've edited motion 6 and I also have another motion, because things are a bit messed up at the moment. (Btw, if anyone else has a last minute motion, please submit it asap.)
|
|
Lüc
Registered guest
MRPTer since April 20th, 2012 (suspended)
Membership suspended.
Posts: 538
Province: Benito
|
Post by Lüc on Nov 27, 2013 13:37:17 GMT 1
Motion 7: Since one of the candidates for the Fiovan Senate race has suddenly dropped out, the congress declares the result of the current vote on the MRPT senate endorsement for Fiova invaled and proposes another partywide vote be held during the week before the elections.
|
|
Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 27, 2013 13:39:00 GMT 1
Oh, seems like you got the same idea. I beat you by a few seconds though
|
|
Lüc
Registered guest
MRPTer since April 20th, 2012 (suspended)
Membership suspended.
Posts: 538
Province: Benito
|
Post by Lüc on Nov 27, 2013 14:24:00 GMT 1
Oh, seems like you got the same idea. I beat you by a few seconds though Shameless copy-edit-paste, I was on my mobile, but that's not fair, you've edited your post :-P Per on all the seven motions.
|
|
Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 27, 2013 14:57:06 GMT 1
When you say per on all 7 motions I'm assuming you're referring to the first motion 7 right? (maybe the second one can be struck through or something, to avoid confusion.)
|
|
|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Nov 27, 2013 15:52:29 GMT 1
Éu sint PER la Phaßiva 1; éu sint PER la Phaßiva 2; éu sint PER la Phaßiva 3; éu sint PER la Phaßiva 4; éu sint PER la Phaßiva 5; éu sint PER la Phaßiva 6; es éu sint PER la Phaßiva 7.
|
|
Adam da Simeon
Registered guest
Former MRPTer
Posts: 17
Province: Florencia
|
Post by Adam da Simeon on Nov 27, 2013 16:59:50 GMT 1
PER to all.
|
|
Lüc
Registered guest
MRPTer since April 20th, 2012 (suspended)
Membership suspended.
Posts: 538
Province: Benito
|
Post by Lüc on Nov 27, 2013 18:56:35 GMT 1
When I say "PER on all 7 motions" I mean: 1. PER 2. PER 3. PER 4. PER 5. PER 6. PER 7. PER
But I was on my mobile AND in the bus.
|
|
Glüc
Registered guest
MRPT Founder (August 2011 - May 2018)
Posts: 652
Province: Cézembre
|
Post by Glüc on Nov 29, 2013 0:39:39 GMT 1
I was referring to the two existing motions 7. There´s two of themnow, but Im assuming you were referring to the first of the two and the second one can be removed. Is that right?
|
|
|
Post by Éovart Andrinescu on Nov 30, 2013 12:09:29 GMT 1
PËR to all
|
|
bhputnam
MRPT Members
MRPTer since February 26th, 2013
Posts: 12
Province: Vuode
|
Post by bhputnam on Nov 30, 2013 14:50:22 GMT 1
Per all. To the first set.
|
|
Lüc
Registered guest
MRPTer since April 20th, 2012 (suspended)
Membership suspended.
Posts: 538
Province: Benito
|
Post by Lüc on Dec 1, 2013 0:19:19 GMT 1
Voting is closed and all the motions have passed.
|
|